We recently posted a case study of how a Fortune 100 company is using Security Visualization as a front end to their various data collection systems. The Security Visualization allows the company's analysts to look at 100's of thousands of correlations each day and apply human pattern recognition to spot the "needles in the haystack". These are threats that are designed to avoid traditional intrusion and event management. Once the potential threat is identified and the log data is carved down to just the logs that are relevant, that subset of log data is then attached to a case study and delivered to case investigation for further evaluation. In addition to identifying and carving down to just the relevant logs, the security visualization also makes it easier to communicate the findings to the extended team.
In this situation data is imported from several sources. Those sources include intrusion detection systems (e.g., SourceFire), firewall protection (e.g., Palo Alto, SonicWALL), and virus scan / endpoint protection (e.g. Symantec) in addition to correlation systems (e.g., HP ESM, Splunk, etc.). Security Visualization allows the analysts to hunt for unknown and unexpected threats. Threats such as time staged attacks, diagonal attacks, cluster attacks, octal jump attacks, embedded activity attacks, etc.
This case study is recorded and can be viewed at http://www.advizorsolutions.com/articles/security-visualization. The case study lasts 25 minutes, and is followed by a Q&A.
ADVIZOR Solutions, Inc.
Hi, I am a Phd candidate in Informatics Institude at Middle East Technical University. I prepared an online survey as a part of my phd thesis. However, since this subject is relatively new I can not find anybody who may fill this survey around me in Turkey.
The survey is in Google Forms, at link https://goo.gl/forms/xbfmrqJ4jxA4rvQ53. It is not very short :( It may take around 20 minutes but it is easy to fill, mostly composed of multi selection questions. Uncompleted survey results are not saved so the participants should complete the survey.
Although we ask questions related to security systems and security visualization systems used to understand the visualization requirements.The survey, in general, does not include questions that give personal discomfort. No tracking information such as email or organization name is asked during the survey. More descriptive information about how the survey results will be used exists in the starting page. So, please do not hesitate to fill, due to your privacy concerns.
I hope experts of this forum may help me by filling the survey during a coffee break. I need to take feedback soon, before my next thesis committee. I appreciate your help to a newbie security visualization researcher (me) :)
Ferda Özdemir Sönmez
The 13th IEEE Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security (VizSec) is a forum that brings together researchers and practitioners from academia, government, and industry to address the needs of the cybersecurity community through new and insightful visualization and analysis techniques. VizSec provides an excellent venue for fostering greater exchange and new collaborations on a broad range of security- and privacy-related topics. VizSec will be held in Baltimore, MD, USA in conjunction with IEEE VIS.
The purpose of VizSec is to explore effective and scalable visual interfaces for security domains such as network security, computer forensics, reverse engineering, insider threat detection, cryptography, privacy, user assisted attacks prevention, compliance management, wireless security, secure coding, and penetration testing.
Full papers describing novel contributions in security visualization are solicited. Papers may present techniques, applications, practical experience, theory, analysis, experiments, or evaluations. We encourage the submission of papers on technologies and methods that promise to improve cyber security practices, including, but not limited to:
- Situation awareness and/or understanding
- Incident handling including triage, exploration, correlation, and response
- Computer forensics
- Recording and reporting results of investigations
- Assisting proactive security configuration and deployment
- Reverse engineering and malware analysis
- Vulnerability management
- Multiple data source analysis
- Analyzing information requirements for computer network defense
- Evaluation and/or user testing of VizSec systems
- Criteria for assessing the effectiveness of cyber security visualizations
(whether from a security goal perspective or a human factors perspective)
- Modeling system and network behavior
- Modeling attacker and defender behavior
- Studying risk and impact of cyber attacks
- Predicting future attacks or targets
- Security metrics and education
- Software security
- Mobile application security
- Social networking privacy and security
When applicable, visualization and interaction techniques that effectively capture the insights of human analysts and/or allow analysts to collaborate efficiently are particularly desirable.
*** New for 2016! *** Case Studies
Short papers describing practical applications of security visualization are solicited. We encourage the submission of papers discussing the introduction of cyber security visualizations into operational context, including, but not limited to:
- Cases where visualization made positive contributions towards meeting
- Gaps or negative outcomes from visualization deployments
- Situations where visualization was not utilized, but could have had a
- Lessons learned from operational engagements
- Insights gained from the transition process
Cyber security practitioners from industry, as well as the research community, are encouraged to submit case studies.
Poster submissions may showcase late-breaking results, work in progress, preliminary results, or visual representations relevant to the VizSec community. The poster program will be a great opportunity for the authors to interact with the attendees and solicit feedback.
Submissions must be formated using the IEEE VGTC template that can be found at http://junctionpublishing.org/vgtc/Tasks/camera.html. All submissions should be in PDF format.
Submit papers and poster abstracts using EasyChair: http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=vizsec2016
Papers should be at most 8 pages including the bibliography and appendices. Papers will be peer-reviewed by at least 3 members of the program committee. Committee members are not required to read the appendices or any pages past the maximum. Submissions not meeting these guidelines will be rejected without consideration of their merit. Reviews are single-blind, so authors may include names and affiliations in their submissions. Submitted papers must not substantially overlap papers that have been published or that are simultaneously submitted to a journal or a conference with proceedings.
The VizSec proceedings will be published by IEEE. Authors of accepted papers must guarantee that their papers will be presented at the conference.
Case studies should be at most 4 pages including the bibliography and appendices. Case study submissions will be reviewed by the Paper Chair(s) and other members of the organizing committee to determine relevance to the VizSec community.
Accepted case study authors will have time to present their work at VizSec during the program.
Accepted case studies will be made available on this website.
Extended abstract for posters should be at most 2 pages including the bibliography. Poster abstracts will be reviewed by the Poster Chair(s) and other members of the organizing committee to determine relevance to the VizSec community.
Accepted authors must present a corresponding poster during the workshop. The poster authors can determine the layout by themselves, but the dimensions of the posters should not exceed the A0 space (841mm x 1189mm or 33.1" x 46.8"). Additionally, poster authors are requested to give a brief oral preview during a plenary "fast forward" session.
Accepted poster abstracts will be made available on VizSec website.
When applicable, submissions including tests and evaluations of the proposed tools and techniques are considered particularly desirable. If possible, making the data used for the tests available will also be considered positively. If you do not have real-world data to demonstrate your visualization, you may be interested in looking at the VAST Challenge data sets.
All deadlines are 5:00 PM PST
Papers and Case Studies
August 1, 2016
Submission for Papers and Case Studies
September 5, 2016
Author Notification for Papers and Case Studies
October 3, 2016
Camera Ready Submission and Copyright Forms for Papers
September 19, 2016
Abstract Submission for Posters
September 30, 2016
Author Notification for Posters
Big data and security intelligence are the two very hot topics in security. We are collecting more and more information from both the infrastructure, but increasingly also directly from our applications. This vast amount of data gets increasingly hard to understand. Terms like map reduce, hadoop, spark, elasticsearch, data science, etc. are part of many discussions. But what are those technologies and techniques? And what do they have to do with security analytics/intelligence? We will see that none of these technologies are sufficient in our quest to defend our networks and information. Data visualization is the only approach that scales to the ever changing threat landscape and infrastructure configurations. Using big data visualization techniques, you uncover hidden patterns of data, identify emerging vulnerabilities and attacks, and respond decisively with countermeasures that are far more likely to succeed than conventional methods. Something that is increasingly referred to as hunting. The attendees will learn about log analysis, big data, information visualization, data sources for IT security, and learn how to generate visual representations of IT data. The training is filled with hands-on exercises utilizing the DAVIX 2014 live CD.
The workshop is being heavily updated over the next months. Check back here to see a list of the new topics covered:
The syllabus is not 100% fixed yet. Stay tuned for some updates.
Log Management, SIEM, and Big Data
Security Visualization Use-Cases
Tools to gather data:
We are also using a number of visualization tools to analyze example data in the labs:
Under the log management section, we are going to discuss:
The section on big data is covering the following:
Raffael Marty is one of the world's most recognized authorities on security data analytics and visualization. Raffy is the founder and CEO of pixlcloud, a next generation visual analytics platform. With a track record at companies including IBM Research and ArcSight, he is thoroughly familiar with established practices and emerging trends in big data analytics. He has served as Chief Security Strategist with Splunk and was a co-founder of Loggly, a cloud-based log management solution. Author of Applied Security Visualization and frequent speaker at academic and industry events, Raffy is a leading thinker and advocate of visualization for unlocking data insights. For more than 14 years, Raffy has worked in the security and log management space to help Fortune 500 companies defend themselves against sophisticated adversaries and has trained organizations around the world in the art of data visualization for security. Zen meditation has become an important part of Raffy's life, sometimes leading to insights not in data but in life.
We've created a free tool for visualizing live streams of network traffic, using JMonkeyEngine (Java 3D gaming engine).
Please take a look at deepnode.com - we would very much appreciate feedback from this community.
Rather than focusing on mining of static datasets, this tool focuses on seeing activity over time, and controlling the timeline so that a human can connect the dots. Here's a link to information on the concept behind the visualization style.
As for the screenshot, this video explains what you're looking at.
This graph visualization shows the propagation of malware through a deliberately infected computer network. Twelve machines in the network were infected to see how the traffic spread to other machines. Over 7800 machines were included in the dataset.
All network in a single chart. Yellow links indicate benign traffic; red links indicate traffic with at least 1 infected packet. Nodes are sized by volume of traffic.
Data taken from the MyDoom-A.tar.gz, available here
Image generated with KeyLines.